Since the answers are in the back of the book for the review exercises, and knowing full well that kids are copying the answers from the back of the book with no attempt at them whatsoever, I made two worksheets to replace the problems in the book. I’m even thinking about using the book’s review as test problems.
On the first day I’ll give them the review for sections 1.1 to 1.4 and then collect them and grade them. I’ll return them the following day and collect them the next day. The students worked quite well on this assignment, but many did not finish in time. Because I had to be gone the next day, I prepared the answers in advance for the students to have.
On the second day I’ll give them the review for sections 1.6 and 1.7. I will go over these problems at the end of the day so that they have them to study from.
Chapter Objectives (those crossed out I did not focus on):
We skipped this section because it isn’t part of the MN math standards.
Day 1:
Instead of doing the “Guesstimating” investigation in the book, I tried having the kids estimate ages of celebrities. Having twenty of them was a bit too much, although the kids did enjoy the exercise. I only did this in one class. For the last two classes, I did something else that didn’t take as long.
1.7 – Estimating Classwork (Celebrities)
Because it took so long, I had the students guess how many steps it would take, starting at the classroom door, to get to (with my steps):
In a previous class, I had the kids do this themselves. Because there are only five points, it does not take a long time to make a scatter plot (the downfall of the celebrities idea) and there is relatively much more time spent on analyzing y=x, over-estimates, and under-estimates.
I only assigned questions 2 and 3 which had to do with overestimating or underestimating.
In class, I put the estimate on the horizontal and the actual on the vertical. This seems logical to me, but the book has it the other way, so I’ll have to make sure that I’m following the textbook’s lead next time.
Vocabulary:
Day 1:
After the quiz, I talked about the difference between one- and two-variable data. I put a dot plot up on the board that showed the number of televisions in different homes. I asked the students what the dots represented and then labeled each dot with a name – Abe, Bertha, Carlos, etc. Then I asked the students how many things do we know about each of these people (one). I then called this “one-variable statistics”.
I then talked about two variable statistics. What if we knew two things about each person – how could we show with one dot both pieces of information? Then I made a scatter plot.
Next, I gave them a list of the ages of husbands and wives at the time of marriage and we worked on graphing them on a two-dimensional plane. We worked on scaling and labeling. I made sure that they understood that each dot did not represent a person this time, but a couple. I called this “two-variable statistics”.
Day 2:
I continued working on the previous day’s work with the couple’s data. I talked about why we graph two variables at once – to see if there is a relationship between the data. I brought up positive, negative, and no relationship. I used Fathom files GrowingKids and BirthrateGNP.
Finally we did an exercise with positive and negative coordinates. (Second side of the previous day’s worksheet). I defined quadrants now, and made sure to ask the students what quadrant we were working on with the couples data.
I then assigned problems 1, 2, 4, and 9 – 11.
I am assigning this for extra credit and want their “research” on a poster.
In order to prepare the students for a quiz on sections 1.1 to 1.4, I had the students work on a review sheet during class. I did go over section 1.4 at the beginning of class as well.
The students have a very difficult time finding the median and quartiles when given a dot-plot. Some students cannot understand the dot-plot itself – they don’t see each dot as a person and the scale at the bottom as the number of keys. Also, the “at least” and “less than” still gets some kids.
Vocab:
Investigation – Hand Spans
The math teacher that usually has the rulers was gone and I couldn’t locate them, so I had the kids find their heights in centimeters using a few meter sticks as they walked in the room. It doesn’t take long, to get the data, but I decided to make the histogram myself on the board because it takes too much time for some kids to create one. This way, I could do three histograms on the board. One with a proper scale and bin size, and two others with bin sizes that are too big or too small.
I then took the same data and made a stem-and-leaf plot under the document camera so that I could turn it 90 degrees and show that it is really equivalent to a histogram (for discrete data). We compared the histograms to the stem-and-leaf plots and talked about when one is preferable to the other.
In the afternoon, I did the histograms on the computer using Fathom. First I showed them a dot plot and a box plot for a quick review and then did the histogram. The only drawback is that I forgot to mention that “0-5″ means all numbers on the interval [0,5). But it is easy to change the bin widths and bring up why too many or too few bins makes for a bad histogram. They looked something like this. The horizontal histogram was created to show the students how it looks identical to the stem-and-leaf plot.
I then let them work on the section numbers 1, 2, 5, 7, 10, and 11.
First day:
I spent about 15 minutes going over homework from 1.2, then gave a quiz on sections 1.1 and 1.2, so I had about 15 minutes for the 1.3 lesson. I only went over the five-number summary using the very top of the worksheet here. I assigned questions 1 and 2 for homework since they did not include box plots.
I’ve found that circling the median (and min and max) makes finding quartile one and three more difficult. It is easier to draw a vertical line through or between two numbers. When circling the minimum (or max) some students don’t use those numbers to find Q1. And when circling two numbers for the median, the students don’t use them to calculate Q1.
1.3 – Five Number Summaries and Box Plots Notes
Second Day:
I passed out the quizzes from the previous day but because the grades were quite high, I did not spend time going over them. I did put a dot plot and a box and whisker plot of the grades up on the screen for the students to see.
I then went over questions 1 and 2 from the previous night’s homework.
Next, I almost finished doing the rest of the notes worksheet that I had passed out the day earlier. I spent a great deal of time explaining:
I did not finish the last part – taking Michael Jordan out of the list of players and redoing the box plot for the 97 Bulls so I left that to them to do for homework.
Third Day:
They worked on numbers 3 – 5, 8, 10, and 11
Question 8 has the students make two box plots using the same scale but many accidentally draw two separate scales. When going over this homework, I will demonstrate why it is difficult to compare two populations using different scales using the following. It is downloadable as well, although Fathom files cannot be uploaded on WordPress :-(
Vocab:
The penny investigation takes too much time, particularly the dot plot. There is a dot plot in the teacher materials that might help move things along. Also, since many students do not have graphing calculators at this point, step 7, which has them find the mean takes much too long. I focused on the median and the mode, using the worksheet that is attached. I did not assign homework after the lesson. On the second day, we did 1 – 3, 5, 7, 10, 11.
The penny data dot plot from this section is to be used again in section 1.3. However, I had given up on the penny data and wrote my own problem for section 1.3 that didn’t include their penny dot plot.
Definitions:
The investigation was good, although the dot plot took more time than I thought it would. There is a sample dot plot in the teaching materials that could be used instead. Some students had difficulty finding their pulse, although I found it helpful to tell them to find it and then keep their hands there until I said “Start” when it was time to begin counting.
The students had difficulty with question 5c which had them tell what would happen if we didn’t take our pulse rates for 15 seconds but instead took them for 60 seconds. More time talking about this is needed when having them multiply their number of pulses by four so that it is more understandable. Perhaps it would be beneficial to have half of the class count pulses for 15 seconds and the other half for a whole minute so that the differences show up on the dot plots.
The investigation took so long that I only gave questions 1 – 4 for homework on the first day. The second day we did 5, 6, 9, 10, 11 once we finished going over the homework. I also gave the students a practice quiz for section 1.1.
Pictographs (shown below) (Right click – “View Image” to see them in all their glory)


